Section 399.25 also provides a "backstop" cost mechanism allowing the utilities to recover through retail rates any costs of the above facilities that are not approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for recovery through transmission rates. Section 399.25 directs the Commission to deem necessary those transmission facilities identified in applications if the proposed facilities are necessary to facilitate achievement of the State's renewable power goals.
#CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVEYANCE SERIES#
Our finding of need for this Antelope-Pardee Transmission Project implements a series of earlier determinations made by this Commission regarding the need to construct transmission lines to the Tehachapi region to facilitate the Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) goals set forth in § 399.11, et seq. of the Public Utilities Code, 1 this decision grants SCE the authority to construct the Antelope-Pardee transmission line project (Antelope-Pardee Transmission Project or Segment 1), 2 in order to ensure access to wind power development in the Tehachapi area and to prevent overloading of existing transmission facilities. This decision grants a certificate of public convenience and necessity (CPCN) to Southern California Edison Company (SCE) to construct a transmission facility in the wind rich Tehachapi region of California. Maximum Cost Pursuant to § 1005.5(a) 92Īttachment A - Environmental Mitigation Measures Applicable to Approved Transmission ProjectĪttachment D - Addendum to the Final EIR/EIS I. Cost Recovery Issues Raised by § 399.25 88 Statement of Overriding Considerations 86 A Combination of Alternative 2, Alternative 4 and the Proposed Project is Environmentally Preferred 82ĭ. Environmentally Superior Alternative 77Ģ. Adequacy and Certification of the Final EIR/EIS 75ī. Project Authorization and Statement of Overriding Considerations 75Ī. Noise Impacts on Veluzat Motion Picture Ranch 72 Noise Impacts on Recreational Users Within the ANF 71Ĥ. Noise Caused by Routine Inspection and Maintenance 71ģ. Impacts on Veluzat Motion Picture Ranch 68Ģ.
Degradation of Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) Routes 66ġ. Disruption of Existing Commercial Land Uses 64Ĥ. Visual Impacts of the Proposed Project 53Ģ.
Construction Impacts on Visual Resources (All Alternatives) 52Ģ. Environmental Impacts of the Antelope-Pardee Transmissionġ. EMF Management Plan for the Antelope-Pardee Transmission Pacific Crest Trail Association Alternative 44ī. City of Santa Clarita's Proposed Establishment of a New Transmission Line Right-of-Way and New Access 41Ģ. Alternatives Presented in Response to the Draft EIR/EIS 40ġ. Alternative 5: Sierra Pelona Re-Route 37ī. Alternative 4: Re-Routing of New Right-of-Way Along Haskell Canyon 35Ħ. Alternative 3: Single-Circuit Towers Between Haskell Canyonĥ. Alternative 2: Antelope-Pardee East Mid-Slope 32Ĥ.
Alternative 1: Partial Undergrounding of Proposed Antelope-Pardee Line 29ģ. Antelope-Pardee Transmission Project Proposed Route and Alternatives Reviewed in Final EIR/EIS 27Ģ. Antelope-Pardee Transmission Project and Route Alternatives 25Ī. Alternatives to the Antelope-Pardee Transmission Project 19 Alternatives to the Proposed Project and the No Project Alternative 18Ī. OPINION GRANTING A CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE (See Attachment C - Service List - for List of Appearances) In the Matter of the Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity Concerning the Antelope-Pardee Project as Required by Decision 04-06-010 and as Modified by Subsequent Assigned Commissioner Ruling. D0703012 Granting a Certificate of Public Convenience and NecessityīEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
0 kommentar(er)
